Sometimes, rules are there to waved away.
For instance, today I accepted some Verification photos that broke an NDN rule, but it was a different rule to the Verification rules.... the photos had been taken by someone using a webcam in freebie mode, and the photos had the webcam website added to the photos.
Now, in my view, the "no photos including a URL" rule was introduced to stop websteals and to stop promotion of sites that are rivals to the NN Network. It was NOT introduced to stop people using a webcam's capture software as a free alternative to buying a digital stills camera.
Therefore, my decision as a moderator was to ignore the URL rule, and to accept the Verification attempt. It's the same kind of process where judges in a law court apply the spirit of the law, rather than the letter of the law.
And if the law-makers don't like it, then they can fuck off and just write better laws. Or find different people to enforce the existing laws.